Re: local DoS - systemd hang or timeout (WAS: Re: [RFC][CFT] splice_read reworked)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, CAI.

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:39:11PM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
...
> Not sure if related, but right after this lockdep happened and trinity running by a
> non-privileged user finished inside the container. The host's systemctl command just
> hang or timeout which renders the whole system unusable.
> 
> # systemctl status docker
> Failed to get properties: Connection timed out
> 
> # systemctl reboot (hang)
> 
...
> [ 5535.893675] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [ 5535.898085] INFO: task kworker/45:4:146035 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [ 5535.906059]       Tainted: G        W       4.8.0-rc8-fornext+ #1
> [ 5535.912865] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [ 5535.921613] kworker/45:4    D ffff880853e9b950 14048 146035      2 0x00000080
> [ 5535.929630] Workqueue: cgroup_destroy css_killed_work_fn
> [ 5535.935582]  ffff880853e9b950 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88086c6da000
> [ 5535.943882]  ffff88086c9e2000 ffff880853e9c000 ffff880853e9baa0 ffff88086c9e2000
> [ 5535.952205]  ffff880853e9ba98 0000000000000001 ffff880853e9b968 ffffffff817cdaaf
> [ 5535.960522] Call Trace:
> [ 5535.963265]  [<ffffffff817cdaaf>] schedule+0x3f/0xa0
> [ 5535.968817]  [<ffffffff817d33fb>] schedule_timeout+0x3db/0x6f0
> [ 5535.975346]  [<ffffffff817cf055>] ? wait_for_completion+0x45/0x130
> [ 5535.982256]  [<ffffffff817cf0d3>] wait_for_completion+0xc3/0x130
> [ 5535.988972]  [<ffffffff810d1fd0>] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
> [ 5535.994804]  [<ffffffff8130de64>] drop_sysctl_table+0xc4/0xe0
> [ 5536.001227]  [<ffffffff8130de17>] drop_sysctl_table+0x77/0xe0
> [ 5536.007648]  [<ffffffff8130decd>] unregister_sysctl_table+0x4d/0xa0
> [ 5536.014654]  [<ffffffff8130deff>] unregister_sysctl_table+0x7f/0xa0
> [ 5536.021657]  [<ffffffff810f57f5>] unregister_sched_domain_sysctl+0x15/0x40
> [ 5536.029344]  [<ffffffff810d7704>] partition_sched_domains+0x44/0x450
> [ 5536.036447]  [<ffffffff817d0761>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x111/0x1f0
> [ 5536.043844]  [<ffffffff81167684>] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x64/0xb0
> [ 5536.051336]  [<ffffffff8116789d>] update_flag+0x11d/0x210
> [ 5536.057373]  [<ffffffff817cf61f>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2df/0x450
> [ 5536.064186]  [<ffffffff81167acb>] ? cpuset_css_offline+0x1b/0x60
> [ 5536.070899]  [<ffffffff810fce3d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [ 5536.077420]  [<ffffffff817cf61f>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2df/0x450
> [ 5536.084234]  [<ffffffff8115a9f5>] ? css_killed_work_fn+0x25/0x220
> [ 5536.091049]  [<ffffffff81167ae5>] cpuset_css_offline+0x35/0x60
> [ 5536.097571]  [<ffffffff8115aa2c>] css_killed_work_fn+0x5c/0x220
> [ 5536.104207]  [<ffffffff810bc83f>] process_one_work+0x1df/0x710
> [ 5536.110736]  [<ffffffff810bc7c0>] ? process_one_work+0x160/0x710
> [ 5536.117461]  [<ffffffff810bce9b>] worker_thread+0x12b/0x4a0
> [ 5536.123697]  [<ffffffff810bcd70>] ? process_one_work+0x710/0x710
> [ 5536.130426]  [<ffffffff810c3f7e>] kthread+0xfe/0x120
> [ 5536.135991]  [<ffffffff817d4baf>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [ 5536.142041]  [<ffffffff810c3e80>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x230/0x230

This one seems to be the offender.  cgroup is trying to offline a
cpuset css, which takes place under cgroup_mutex.  The offlining ends
up trying to drain active usages of a sysctl table which apprently is
not happening.  Did something hang or crash while trying to generate
sysctl content?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux