On Mon 03-10-16 19:35:18, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Michal Hocko: > > >> I'm not sure if I can reproduce this issue in a sufficiently reliable > >> way, but I can try. (I still have not found the process which causes > >> the xfs_inode allocations go up.) > >> > >> Is linux-next still the tree to test? > > > > Yes it contains all the compaction related fixes which we believe to > > address recent higher order OOMs. > > I tried 4.7.5 instead. I could not reproduce the issue so far there. > Thanks to whoever fixed it. :) The 4.7 stable tree contains a workaround rather than the full fix we would like to have in 4.9. So if you can then testing the current linux-next would be really appreciated. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
