Re: [PATCH] pkeys: Introduce PKEY_ALLOC_SIGNALINHERIT and change signal semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/02/2018 10:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

See above.  The signal handler will crash if it calls any non-local
function through the GOT because with the default access rights, it's
not readable in the signal handler.

Any use of memory protection keys for basic infrastructure will run into
this problem, so I think the current kernel behavior is not very useful.
    It's also x86-specific.

   From a security perspective, the atomic behavior is not very useful
because you generally want to modify PKRU *before* computing the details
of the memory access, so that you don't have a general “poke anywhere
with this access right” primitive in the text segment.  (I called this
the “suffix problem” in another context.)


Ugh, right.  It's been long enough that I forgot about the underlying
issue.  A big part of the problem here is that pkey_alloc() should set the
initial value of the key across all threads, but it *can't*.  There is
literally no way to do it in a multithreaded program that uses RDPKRU and
WRPKRU.

The kernel could do *something*, probably along the membarrier system call. I mean, I could implement a reasonable close approximation in userspace, via the setxid mechanism in glibc (but I really don't want to).

But I think the right fix, at least for your use case, is to have a per-mm
init_pkru variable that starts as "deny all".  We'd add a new pkey_alloc()
flag like PKEY_ALLOC_UPDATE_INITIAL_STATE that causes the specified mode to
update init_pkru.  New threads and delivered signals would get the
init_pkru state instead of the hardcoded default.

I implemented this for signal handlers:

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-api&m=151285420302698&w=2

This does not alter the thread inheritance behavior yet. I would have to investigate how to implement that.

Feedback led to the current patch, though. I'm not sure what has changed since then.

If I recall correctly, the POWER maintainer did express a strong desire back then for (what is, I believe) their current semantics, which my PKEY_ALLOC_SIGNALINHERIT patch implements for x86, too.

Thanks,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x86_64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ia64]     [Linux Kernel]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]
  Powered by Linux