On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:29:07PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Christian Borntraeger
> <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone with a new propopal? ;-) ^
>
> one more proposal :)
> #define __ACCESS_ONCE(x) ({ typeof(x) __var = 0; (volatile typeof(x) *)&(x); })
> #define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*__ACCESS_ONCE(x))
>
> works as lvalue...
> the basic idea is the same:
> constant zero can be used to initialize any scalar
> (including pointers), but unions and structs will fail to compile as:
> "error: invalid initializer"
>
> If I'm reading pr58145 gcc bug report correctly, it
> miscompiles only structs, so we can let ACCESS_ONCE
> to work on unions. Then the following will rejects structs only:
> #define __ACCESS_ONCE(x) ({ (typeof(x))0; (volatile typeof(x) *)&(x); })
> #define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*__ACCESS_ONCE(x))
You beat me to it. ;-)
However, your approach would allow an ACCESS_ONCE() of a long long
to compile on 32-bit systems where it has to be broken up into a
pair of 32-bit accesses.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x86_64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
