Ingo Molnar wrote:
Small detail, the syntactic form you chose:
+ if (!cpu->arch.idt[num].p)
is not very readable because it's not obvious at first sight that ".p"
intends to mean "present bit". If then idt[num].present would have
been the better choice - but it's even better to not do bitfields at
all but an idt_present(desc *) helper inline function.
There is, however, some benefit to use the field names that are in the
official documentation, which include P.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x86_64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html