On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:35 PM Martin Schiller <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, that's also the reason why I already acked this patch. We can > solve this later a little bit cleaner if necessary. > > My patch that takes care of the orphaned packets in x25_receive_data() > has again a dependency on other patches, especially the patch to > configure the neighbor parameters (DCE/DTE, number of channels etc.), > which I already sent before but still have to revise. > > Unfortunately I have only limited time for this topic, so I am not as > fast as some people would wish. Sorry for that. OK. Thanks! I appreciate your work! Code needs to have specialist developers like you to keep it alive and evolving. I understand you have limited time. Please take your time. Thanks!
