Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] netfilter: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 03:09:45PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
> 	Hello,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
> 
> > From: Joel Granados <j.granados@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> > empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will
> > reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory
> > bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/)
> > 
> > * Remove sentinel elements from ctl_table structs
> > * Remove instances where an array element is zeroed out to make it look
> >   like a sentinel. This is not longer needed and is safe after commit
> >   c899710fe7f9 ("networking: Update to register_net_sysctl_sz") added
> >   the array size to the ctl_table registration
> > * Remove the need for having __NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL as the
> >   sysctl array size is now in NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL
> > * Remove extra element in ctl_table arrays declarations
> > 
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> # loadpin & yama
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c         | 1 -
> >  net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 1 -
> >  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c          | 5 +----
> >  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c         | 5 +----
> >  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c        | 5 +----
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 6 +-----
> >  net/netfilter/nf_log.c                  | 3 +--
> >  7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > index 143a341bbc0a..50b5dbe40eb8 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> 
> ...
> 
> > @@ -4286,10 +4285,8 @@ static int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> >  			return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> >  		/* Don't export sysctls to unprivileged users */
> > -		if (net->user_ns != &init_user_ns) {
> > -			tbl[0].procname = NULL;
> > +		if (net->user_ns != &init_user_ns)
> >  			ctl_table_size = 0;
> > -		}
> >  	} else
> >  		tbl = vs_vars;
> >  	/* Initialize sysctl defaults */
> 
> 	We are in process of changing this code (not in trees yet):
> 
> https://marc.info/?t=171345219600002&r=1&w=2
> 
> 	As I'm not sure which patch will win, the end result should
> be this single if-block/hunk to be removed.
Thx for the heads up. I have made a note of it in case this set ends up
being after yours.


> 
> Regards
> 
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> 

-- 

Joel Granados

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux