Hello, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:03:03 -0700: > Add an enum heading to the kernel-doc comments to prevent > kernel-doc warnings. > > cfg802154.h:174: warning: Cannot understand * @WPAN_PHY_FLAG_TRANSMIT_POWER: Indicates that transceiver will support > on line 174 - I thought it was a doc line > > cfg802154.h:192: warning: Enum value 'WPAN_PHY_FLAG_TXPOWER' not described in enum 'wpan_phy_flags' > cfg802154.h:192: warning: Excess enum value 'WPAN_PHY_FLAG_TRANSMIT_POWER' description in 'wpan_phy_flags' > > Fixes: edea8f7c75ec ("cfg802154: introduce wpan phy flags") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-wpan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I believe the whole series is subject to be taken directly by the net maintainers, so: Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> Please let me know if I should instead consider this patch for the wpan tree. Thanks, Miquèl