On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:57:29 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > Sorry, I don't follow. I don't touch that wrappers, just fix errors > > related to OF device ID tables, although in few cases it is indeed > > related to of_match_node. > > I'm saying this because in lantiq_gswip.c, xway_gphy_match is accessed > through of_match_node(). If the shim definition for of_match_node() was > different, the variable wouldn't have been unused with CONFIG_OF=n. > I guess it's worth considering changing that wrapper instead of adding > the __maybe_unused. Hi Krzysztof, have you had a chance to check if using an empty static inline is enough to silence the compiler? Seems like it could save us quite some churn? Or do we want the of_match_node() decorations to go away in general?
