Hi Arnd,
arnd@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:51:23 +0100:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> There are no remaining in-tree users of the platform_data,
> so this driver can be converted to using the simpler gpiod
> interfaces.
>
> Any out-of-tree users that rely on the platform data can
> provide the data using the device_property and gpio_lookup
> interfaces instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 82 +++++++++---------------------
> include/linux/spi/at86rf230.h | 20 --------
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/spi/at86rf230.h
>
[...]
> @@ -1682,7 +1650,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, at86rf230_device_id);
> static struct spi_driver at86rf230_driver = {
> .id_table = at86rf230_device_id,
> .driver = {
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at86rf230_of_match),
> + .of_match_table = at86rf230_of_match,linux-gnueabihf embed a C library which relies on kernel headers (for example, to provide an open API which translates to an open syscall), for exam
Looks like an unrelated change? Or is it a consequence of "not having
any in-tree users of platform_data" that plays a role here?
Anyhow, the changes in the driver look good, so:
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Miquèl
