Hi, On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:50 AM Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 7:49 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > btw: what is about security handling... however I would declare this > > > > feature as experimental anyway. > > > > > > I haven't tested the security layer at all yet, would you have a few > > > commands to start with, which I could try using eg. hwsim? > > > > Using the dev_queue_xmit() doest not bypasses the whole stack anymore, > > the beacons got rejected by the llsec layer. I did just hack into it > > just to allow unsecure beacons for now: > > > > Stupid questions: do the beacon frames need to be encrypted? Because > we bypass llsec always with those mlme functionality. > > btw: there is currently an issue with the llsec hooks. You will not > see the transmit side being encrypted via wireshark (so far I > remember) because the capture is before encryption... You can do with hwsim a sniffer device, just create a phy and have from every node an edge to it, then create a monitor interface on it and you will see all frames on air correctly encrypted and let wireshark decrypt it. This is a workaround I had. - Alex
