syzbot is hitting skb_assert_len() warning at raw_sendmsg() for ieee802154
socket. What commit dc633700f00f726e ("net/af_packet: check len when
min_header_len equals to 0") does also applies to ieee802154 socket.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5ea725c25d06fb9114c4
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+5ea725c25d06fb9114c4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: fd1894224407c484 ("bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I checked that reproducer no longer hits skb_assert_len() warning, but
what return value should we use? Is -EDESTADDRREQ better than -EINVAL?
net/ieee802154/socket.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ieee802154/socket.c b/net/ieee802154/socket.c
index 7889e1ef7fad..cbd0e2ac4ffe 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/socket.c
+++ b/net/ieee802154/socket.c
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+ if (!size)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
lock_sock(sk);
if (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
dev = dev_getfirstbyhwtype(sock_net(sk), ARPHRD_IEEE802154);
--
2.34.1
