Hi Stefan, On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:56 PM Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Luiz. > > On 01.06.22 23:48, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:37 PM Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> On 28.04.22 05:05, Alexander Aring wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> this patch series removes the rb data structure for looking up a nhc by > >>> nhc id. Instead we using the existing nexthdr lookup array by iterating > >>> over it and find the right nhc by nhc id. It's simply not worth it to > >>> use such complex handling for such small amount of nhc. As we only > >>> support nhc ids which fits into 1 byte and there are not two byte nhc > >>> ids values specified yet, we let the nhc layer only handle 1 byte values. > >>> If there is the need for 2 byte nhc values we can add support for it. > >>> > >>> - Alex > >>> > >>> Alexander Aring (3): > >>> net: 6lowpan: remove const from scalars > >>> net: 6lowpan: use array for find nhc id > >>> net: 6lowpan: constify lowpan_nhc structures > >> > >> Marcel, Luiz, are you still picking up generic 6lowpan patches or only > >> the ones for bluetooth? > >> > >> These three have been around for over a month and acked by me and Jukka, > >> but I can't find them anywhere in bluetooth-next or Linus tree. > >> > >> If 6lowpan is of less concern for you I can route them through my > >> ieee80254 tree as well. > > > > Up to you, I was not aware they normally were merged thru > > bluetooth-next but I would be fine merging those as well. > > If you and Marcel don't mind I would like to switch this over to being > merged through ieee802154. Mostly because 6lowpan is vital for the 15.4 > work we have. > > With Jukka stepping down from co-maintaining this part (thanks a lot for > your work!) this will most likely be reviewed by Alex and me anyway. > > We still need to ensure that patches are hitting wpan as well as > bluetooth mailing list, but the MAINTAINERS file handles this already. > > Let me know if you are unhappy with the switch. If not I will start with > merging these three as well as the MAINTAINERS update from Jukka. I have no problem with that. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz