Hi Alexander, alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:07:53 -0500: > Hi, > > I will do this review again because I messed up with other series. > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:20 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: David Girault <david.girault@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > It makes certainly more sense to have all the low-range wireless > > protocols such as Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11 (WiFi) and IEEE 802.15.4 > > together, so let's move the main IEEE 802.15.4 stack Kconfig entry at a > > better location. > > > > As the softMAC layer has no meaning outside of the IEEE 802.15.4 stack > > and cannot be used without it, also move the mac802154 menu inside > > ieee802154/. > > > > That's why there is a "depends on". > > > Signed-off-by: David Girault <david.girault@xxxxxxxxx> > > [miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx: Isolate this change from a bigger commit and > > rewrite the commit message.] > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > net/Kconfig | 3 +-- > > net/ieee802154/Kconfig | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig > > index 8a1f9d0287de..a5e31078fd14 100644 > > --- a/net/Kconfig > > +++ b/net/Kconfig > > @@ -228,8 +228,6 @@ source "net/x25/Kconfig" > > source "net/lapb/Kconfig" > > source "net/phonet/Kconfig" > > source "net/6lowpan/Kconfig" > > -source "net/ieee802154/Kconfig" > > I would argue here that IEEE 802.15.4 is no "network option". However > I was talking once about moving it, but people don't like to move > things there around. > In my opinion there is no formal place to "have all the low-range > wireless such as Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11 (WiFi) and IEEE 802.15.4 > together". If you bring all subsystems together and put them into an > own menuentry this would look different. > > If nobody else complains about moving Kconfig entries here around it > looks okay for me. > > > -source "net/mac802154/Kconfig" > > source "net/sched/Kconfig" > > source "net/dcb/Kconfig" > > source "net/dns_resolver/Kconfig" > > @@ -380,6 +378,7 @@ source "net/mac80211/Kconfig" > > > > endif # WIRELESS > > > > +source "net/ieee802154/Kconfig" > > source "net/rfkill/Kconfig" > > source "net/9p/Kconfig" > > source "net/caif/Kconfig" > > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/Kconfig b/net/ieee802154/Kconfig > > index 31aed75fe62d..7e4b1d49d445 100644 > > --- a/net/ieee802154/Kconfig > > +++ b/net/ieee802154/Kconfig > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ config IEEE802154_SOCKET > > for 802.15.4 dataframes. Also RAW socket interface to build MAC > > header from userspace. > > > > +source "net/mac802154/Kconfig" > > The next person in a year will probably argue "but wireless do source > of wireless/mac80211 in net/Kconfig... so this is wrong". > To avoid this issue maybe we should take out the menuentry here and do > whatever wireless is doing without questioning it? Without discussing the cleanliness of the wireless subsystem, I don't feel bad proposing alternatives :) I'm fine adapting to your preferred solution either way, so could you clarify what should I do: - Drop that commit entirely. - Move things into their own submenu (we can discuss the naming, "Low range wireless Networks" might be a good start). - Keep it like it is. Thanks, Miquèl