Hi, On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:59 PM, David Palma <david.palma@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11 Nov 2017, at 19:53, Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> David Palma <david.palma@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I'm all for routing and starting with RPL is fine. However, the idea >>> was also to enable traffic differentiation based on flows (the SDN >>> part), without breaking them, and not only based on IP >>> addresses. That's why I mentioned that I used routing and ip6tables. >> >> I don't understand what the problem is. >> What would you do with bridged interfaces in an SDN? > > For example, if you use Open vSwitch for the SDN part, you add an interface to a bridge and manage flows from there. > >> What kind of breaking are you speaking of? > > By breaking I mean, for example: > - establish a CoAP transaction with DTLS through one interface/network (e.g. .11, fd03::120) Check out ndisc proxy for IPv6. There is no automatically handling for that inside the kernel (please send-patches, somebody wanted already such feature). What I mean for IPv4 yes, but for IPv6 you need a daemon like [0]. - Alex [0] https://github.com/DanielAdolfsson/ndppd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
