On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 17:31 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> nla_data() is now aligned on a 64-bit area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/net/netlink.h | 8 +++++---
> include/net/nl802154.h | 6 ++++++
> net/ieee802154/nl802154.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
> index 6f51a8a06498..7f6b99483ab7 100644
> --- a/include/net/netlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/netlink.h
> @@ -878,14 +878,16 @@ static inline int nla_put_net64(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, __be64 value)
> }
>
> /**
> - * nla_put_le64 - Add a __le64 netlink attribute to a socket buffer
> + * nla_put_le64 - Add a __le64 netlink attribute to a socket buffer and align it
> * @skb: socket buffer to add attribute to
> * @attrtype: attribute type
> * @value: numeric value
> + * @padattr: attribute type for the padding
> */
> -static inline int nla_put_le64(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, __le64 value)
> +static inline int nla_put_le64(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, __le64 value,
> + int padattr)
> {
> - return nla_put(skb, attrtype, sizeof(__le64), &value);
> + return nla_put_64bit(skb, attrtype, sizeof(__le64), &value, padattr);
> }
>
But _why_ is it needed ?
nla_put() has no alignment assumptions, it simply copies 8 bytes.
Seems this is going too far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
