Re: [RFCv2 bluetooth-next 2/3] ipv6: add ipv6_addr_prefix_cpy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 18/11/15 14:55, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 11/18/2015 1:33 AM, Alexander Aring wrote:

This patch adds a static inline function ipv6_addr_prefix_cpy which

   I suggest not to reduce "copy".

Agreed. Not worth saving one character here.


copies a ipv6 address prefix(argument pfx) into the ipv6 address prefix.
The prefix len is given by plen as bits. This function mainly based on
ipv6_addr_prefix which copies one address prefix from address into a new
ipv6 address destination and zero all other address bits.

The difference is that ipv6_addr_prefix_cpy don't get a prefix from an
ipv6 address, it sets a prefix to an ipv6 address with keeping other
address bits. The use case is for context based address compression
inside 6LoWPAN IPHC header which keeping ipv6 prefixes inside a context
table to lookup address-bits without sending them.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/net/ipv6.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
index e1a10b0..9d38fc2 100644
--- a/include/net/ipv6.h
+++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
@@ -382,6 +382,21 @@ static inline void ipv6_addr_prefix(struct in6_addr *pfx,
          pfx->s6_addr[o] = addr->s6_addr[o] & (0xff00 >> b);
  }

+static inline void ipv6_addr_prefix_cpy(struct in6_addr *addr,
+                    const struct in6_addr *pfx,
+                    int plen)
+{
+    /* caller must guarantee 0 <= plen <= 128 */
+    int o = plen >> 3,
+        b = plen & 0x7;

   Unusual declaration style, why not just have *int* on both lines?


He took that from ipv6_addr_prefix() defined above it. I would also prefer a second line with int for the second declaration. But as he followed the coding style already around I think both way are fine.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux