Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We currently supports multiple lowpan interfaces per wpan interface. I
> never saw any use case into such functionality. We drop this feature
I was confused at first, because I was sure that you didn't mean that we
would not have support for multiple radios.
What you are saying is that we won't have multiple lowpan adaption layers per
wpan interface? That does not, I think mean that we can't respond to multiple
EUI-64 layer-2 addresses, but does it have any affect on ability to respond
to multiple 16-bit (short) addresses?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
