Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next] at86rf230: remove hrtimer on 1 usec delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,

> According Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt the usually case for
> setting up a hrtimer takes > ~10us. So we should use udelay in this
> case so we are sure that the state change was done, before doing the
> state change assert.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux