On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote: > > > This is for the same reason as above. Alignment in the output, it is a trade > > > off between "readability" in two different ways. Alignment in the output or > > > printing the full word "Unknown". I will change this to "Unknown" and we can > > > change it at a later date if it ever shows up and mess up alignment. In any > > > case if "Unknown" shows up the actual frequency should be added instead of > > > fixing alignment. ;) > > > > > > > Then maybe some "-" instead "unkown", is this better, or it's too small > > then? > > > > The more I think about it the more I feel "Unknown" is better. If for some > reason the channel page and channel combination is not listed and "Unknown" is > printed the last thing the user will care about is alignment in the output. > > Channel page and channel number information will not change that often > so we should be able to keep up with future changes (additions). I have > tried to get hold of the 802.15.4-2015 draft from March/April but > without success. The local university will charge me ~350€ or something > in that region for it. I wanted it to see if any new channel > pages/channels have been added since -2011 edition. There are some amendments already available for download that document new channel pages: 802.15.4f-2012.pdf: channel pages 7, 8 802.15.4g-2012.pdf: channel pages 9, 10 802.15.4j-2013.pdf: channel page 11 802.15.4k-2013.pdf: channel page 12 802.15.4p-2014.pdf: channel page 13 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
