Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next 2/3] at86rf230: remove unnecessary spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,

> This spinlock isn't necessary because if we are in TX_ON/TX_ARET_ON
> state the transceiver can't be interrupted e.g. by receiving a frame
> when a SHR was detected. In this time the transceiver doesn't leave
> the TX_ON/TX_ARET_ON state until the tx complete irq change the state
> into RX_AACK_ON again. This means a receiving interrupt in state
> TX_ON/TX_ARET_ON can't happen and is_tx is protected by transceiver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux