Re: [PATCH net 0/2] netns: audit netdevice creation with IFLA_NET_NS_[PID|FD]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 27/01/2015 21:26, Alexander Aring a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:50:31PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 27/01/2015 15:06, Alexander Aring a écrit :
Hi,

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:28:47PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
...
[snip]

I don't know how wpan0 is created and if this interface can be created directly
in another netns than init_net.


no it can't. The wpan0 interface can be created via the 802.15.4
userspace tools and we don't have such option for namespaces. It
should be always to init_net while creation.
Even with 'ip netns exec foo iwpan ...'?


I did a quick test:

diff --git a/net/mac802154/iface.c b/net/mac802154/iface.c
index 6fb6bdf..df55b42 100644
--- a/net/mac802154/iface.c
+++ b/net/mac802154/iface.c
@@ -590,6 +590,11 @@ ieee802154_if_add(struct ieee802154_local *local, const char *name,
         list_add_tail_rcu(&sdata->list, &local->interfaces);
         mutex_unlock(&local->iflist_mtx);

+       if (net_eq(dev_net(ndev), &init_net))
+               printk(KERN_INFO "it's init_net\n");
+       else
+               printk(KERN_INFO "it's not init_net\n");

With this patch and running:

ip netns exec foo iwpan phy phy0 interface add bar%d type node

I got a:

[   52.032956] it's init_net

It's also init_net when I run with "ip netns exec foo iwpan ..."
Ok. After looking at the code, it's right that no netns is set in
ieee802154_if_add(), thus the interface is in the default netns (init_net).

[snip]

But I still wonder if we should add a check about dev_net(dev) != init_net in
net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c.
If my understanding is correct:
  - wpan can be created directly in a netns != init_net
  - 6lowpan must be in the same netns than wpan
  - code under net/ieee802154 only works in init_net, thus 6lowpan only works
    in init_net.

Do you agree?

yes. I will put the last item on my ToDo list if we can do more netns
stuff there.
Cool.


What about this (based on net-next)?


There are some little issues, see below.

 From 5ca1c46c68e4e4381b2f7e284f5dadeb28a53b2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:26:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] wpan/6lowpan: fix netns settings


use "ieee802154:" instead "wpan/6lowpan:".
Ok.


Can you rebase this patch on bluetooth-next?
Will do.

[snip]
--- a/net/mac802154/iface.c
+++ b/net/mac802154/iface.c
@@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ static void ieee802154_if_setup(struct net_device *dev)
  	dev->mtu		= IEEE802154_MTU;
  	dev->tx_queue_len	= 300;
  	dev->flags		= IFF_NOARP | IFF_BROADCAST;
+	dev->features		|= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;

We should set this inside the cfg802154_netdev_notifier_call function
and NETDEV_REGISTER case. This can be found in "net/ieee802154/core.c". [0]

The branch "net/mac802154" affects 802.15.4 SoftMAC interfaces only. We
currently support SoftMAC only, but further we support HardMAC drivers.
The HardMAC drivers doesn't use the "net/mac802154" branch and call
netdev_register in driver layer.

When we do it in cfg802154_netdev_notifier_call then this will be set
for SoftMAC and HardMAC drivers (when we have a HardMAC driver). The
same behaviour can also be found in wireless implementation. [1]
Ok.


Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux