Re: [ANNOUNCE] wpan-tools 0.3 released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/14 12:19, Alexander Aring wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi,

please use bluetooth-next [0] for the wpan-tools. For experiment things use
wpan_rework_rfc branch. I have still patches there which should be go
into mainline but isn't easy to touch the code without breaking.
Now I remember, I changed the netlink interface too much and doesn't
change it inside the wpan_rework_rfc branch.

So it's only working if you hack the nl802154.h header and copy it into
wpan-tools or simple forget this branch. This is my dirty dev branch
only for bringing the rework mainline, which is still in progress.

- Alex

Now I'm confused. Forget using which branch? bluetooth-next? wpan_rework_rfc? linux-wpan-next?

Which is the most current yet stable closest to rfc4944 compliance kernel to use? Which user tools should I use with it?

Initially I just want to ping between two of 6LoWPAN linux systems.

In time I'll create a 3 node mesh and ping from one node via the second to the third as a destination.

Eventually I add another 6LoWPAN node that will be a "Full Function Device" and routes to traditional IPv6.


Thanks,
MikeC

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux