On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:13:25PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Simon Vincent wrote: > > Currently there does not seem to be any filtering in the mac layer anyway. > > In wpan.c mac802154_subif_frame we check the pan id and dest address but we > > don't discard any packets. Should we be discarding packets at this point? > > For example packets of type PACKET_OTHERHOST. > > > > If I discard all PACKET_OTHERHOST in mac802154_subif_frame it solves my > > problem. I just don't know if this will effect anything else. > > > > Please see [0]. IPv6 will drop all PACKET_OTHERHOST. Maybe this > information is gone by some new skb_alloc's. Simon can you check this? > > Simple add some printk before deliver to IPv6 layer. > > And no, we don't make this at mac802154 layer. > Maybe we should do this in 6LoWPAN Layer. Means a: if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST) { kfree_skb(skb); return NET_RX_DROP; } in lowpan_rcv [0] function. I am not 100% sure right now, but I think it's better than we don't parse any OTHERHOST frames in 6LoWPAN packet layer. But this is another issue... - Alex [0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c#L456 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html