Hi Alex, I'm not keen on handling kfree_skb inside of lowpan_process_data for reasons already stated in a previous email. I'll have a rethink to see if there's another way of handling this. One idea I'm investigating is pskb_expand_head, this doesn't create a new sk_buff but adds room to the head and/or tail which seems perfect for decompression. There must only be a reference count of 1, so we would need to make a copy if this is the case before passing to decompression, I can't think why there would be more than 1 reference as the packet will only have passed through the 802.15.4 layer and only 6LoWPAN can decompress it. If it's cloned for monitoring then this would be a problem. Any thoughts on this? - Martin. On 25/09/14 06:55, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:30:32PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > ... >> Maybe simple do that what Jukka said, to handle the kfree_skb inside of >> lowpan_process_data. What's wrong now with that? >> > ping. Really bad issue, what's about the state to fix it? > > - Alex > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
