Hi Martin,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 18/09/14 17:05, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >Hi Martin,
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:36:55PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> >>On 18/09/14 14:42, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:34:24PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>>...
> >>>>>I want to be able from COORD or NODE mode to put the device in promiscuous mode so packets can be received by wireshark. For example if we are seeing a problem on a device, I want to be able to ssh into this node via Ethernet (or maybe connect via the serial console) and run tcpdump -U -i wpan0 to help debugging by seeing what packets are being sent/received. As it's going to stdout it will be sent over ssh and I can then do some pipe redirection to pipe it into Wireshark running on a different machine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From my understanding this is not MONITOR mode and I don't won't to put the device into MONITOR mode as this could effect it's functionality.
> >>>>>I'm currently looking at how tcpdump does this and it looks like it uses a raw socket using PF_PACKET. I think it then sets the IFF_PROMISC flag on this socket to put the device into promiscuous mode. As I'm in COORD or NODE mode this will arrive at the ndo_change_rx_flags for the net device ops defined in wpan.c not monitor.c in my linux tree.
> >>>Has nothing to do with raw sockets, I think.
> >>I'm just going on what I'm seeing in libpcap, I think tshark and tcpdump both use this library. If you have a debug environment setup, set a breakpoint on activate_new or look through pcap-linux.c, one of the first things it does is:
> >> sock_fd = is_any_device ?
> >> socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_DGRAM, htons(ETH_P_ALL)) :
> >> socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL));
> >>
> >>is_any_device should be set to false as we are capturing a specific device so we should be creating a raw socket. Then later on
> >> if (!is_any_device && handle->opt.promisc) {
> >> memset(&mr, 0, sizeof(mr));
> >> mr.mr_ifindex = handlep->ifindex;
> >> mr.mr_type = PACKET_MR_PROMISC;
> >> if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_ADD_MEMBERSHIP,
> >> &mr, sizeof(mr)) == -1) {
> >> snprintf(handle->errbuf, PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE,
> >> "setsockopt: %s", pcap_strerror(errno));
> >> close(sock_fd);
> >> return PCAP_ERROR;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>Then I think this ends up in the kernel at packet_dev_mc
> >>http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/packet/af_packet.c#L3060
> >>which calls dev_set_promiscuity.
> >>
> >yes, there existing any magic for capturing all interface incomming and
> >outcomming data. But I don't know now how this is related currently.
> >
> >You exacly want the incomming/outcomming data of an interface and that's
> >what the default behaviour is. There existing also some netdev flag
> >which activate this the "IFF_PROMISC". But then we don't need any
> >handling to turn the device driver into any special mode?
> >
> >We already support the promiscuous mode. I mean the normal capturing of
> >interface data and this is the default behaviour, we don't need any
> >extra implementation to make something when rx flag IFF_PROMISC is set.
> >
> >Is there something missing now, which we should support when activate
> >wireshark & co on a wpan interface?
> >
> >- Alex
> I thought the default behaviour was to filter? Currently we implement the hw
> filter driver op function and our HW implements the third level of filtering
> as per 802.15.4 spec so by default we only get packets for our PAN/Address.
> I think one of the user space functions, probably iz sends a netlink command
> which invokes the driver operation to set the filter up in the driver.
> So I want to use set promisc to disable this HW filter and let all packets
> through.
But this is MONITOR iftype then "to see all packets without filtering".
Doing a ifup on a MONITOR interface will enable the HW promiscuous mode.
Then you need also to disable the linux address filtering -> mac802154
and a MONITOR interface bypass this filtering.
This behaviour is not currently at mainline. But you also want to
interact as a normal node? I don't follow right now.
Doing a ifup on a NODE/WPAN enables normal hw address filtering.
Then you need also to enable the linux address filtering -> mac802154
and a NODE interface does not bypass the filtering. Because we need to
be sure that's belong to us and sending pkt_type, etc...
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
