Re: [PATCH wpan-next 12/12] mac802154: rework sdata state change to running

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:05:37AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Looks good, I would think that the mutex is not needed as set_bit and clear_bit are atomic operations??
>

you are right, it's atomic. I will change the commit msg according to
this. I thought it would be locked because it's only read/write when
rtnl lock is hold. This is the current behaviour, but it's not
necessary.

- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux