On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 November 2012 11:26, Thomas Pedersen <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From our captures it looks like the entire aggragate gets the same >> timestamp (first frame?). > > Right, so MACTIME_END is not appropriate there? I don't think it really matters since before they would also all get the same timestamp anyway? Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
