On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 14:37 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> The lower driver might rely on getting zeroed per-vif private memory >> when an interface is added. Resetting the memory on removal avoids >> adverse affects during recovery, where the interface is added without >> being removed. > > However, it means that data isn't stable across suspend/resume, which > could be desirable to the driver as it may want to have the same > configuration after resuming. > > I think we should therefore leave this to the driver, it's obviously > easily implemented as the last step of the driver's ->remove_interface() > Agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
