The old ifdef CONFIG_BRCMFISCAN looks wrong to me and it makes more
sense when CONFIG_BRCMISCAN is used.
This patch was just compile tested by me, but not runtime tested.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c
index cb30fea..6d55424 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/wl_cfg80211.c
@@ -4197,7 +4197,7 @@ static s32 brcmf_mode_to_nl80211_iftype(s32 mode)
static void brcmf_wiphy_pno_params(struct wiphy *wiphy)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_BRCMFISCAN
+#ifndef CONFIG_BRCMISCAN
/* scheduled scan settings */
wiphy->max_sched_scan_ssids = BRCMF_PNO_MAX_PFN_COUNT;
wiphy->max_match_sets = BRCMF_PNO_MAX_PFN_COUNT;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
