On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 11:49 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote: > > > > The patches also add flow control to stop incoming tx packets when the > > > DMA ring is full. In practice I found that we will sometimes receive a > > > single frame from mac80211 after stopping the queues, so some headroom > > > is reserved when stopping the queues. I also reduced the number of tx > > > descriptors per ring to 64 and fixed a bug that prevented having > > > differing non-zero numbers of tx and rx descriptors for a given ring. > > > > > It is strange that you would get one frame after stopping the queues. > > Apart from the iface up/down code which I did not look at, it seems the tx > > codepaths for queues stop/wake are all properly protected by spin_lock_bhs. > > You mention a possible race in your code comments .. are you referring to > > mac80211 or the driver itself ? > > It's generally a race between mac80211 and the driver, if the driver > uses ieee80211_stop_queue() outside the TX path, the TX path can be > handing it a packet at the exact same time, and therefore there can be > one packet (on each queue!) that goes to the driver during the call to > stop_queue(). > Yes, yet in this case, it seems to be another pb. The driver performs ieee80211_stop_queue() inside the TX path exept for the call within the tx status callback tasklet for ampdu retries - and the latter should not trigger the pb since, as the comment puts it: { /* * We shouldn't be out of space in the DMA * ring here since we're reinserting a frame * that was just pulled out. */ } At first sight I would more likely doubt the txavail, though I haven't really looked into the code, the potential race caught my attention within the diff and I thought it might be useful to follow up. Karl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html