On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 12:18 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> >> mutex_lock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
> >> tid_tx = rcu_dereference_protected_tid_tx(sta, tid);
> >>
> >> if (WARN_ON(!tid_tx)) {
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
> >> printk(KERN_DEBUG "addBA was not requested!\n");
> >> #endif
> >
> > Hm should probably be a WARN(), but ...
> >
> >>From the backtrace it looks like maybe you were tearing down the
> > interface? So maybe it's possible that you were remove it or something,
> > and the driver had just accepted the session? Hmm.
>
> I've got 400 interfaces churning, some being reset due to lack of
> fast enough DHCP response, etc. Could easily be related to that
> drv-remove-interface bug as well..
I didn't even think of that, but yeah, that seems possible.
> it is much more easily reproduced
> in this scenario. Will re-run some tests with your suggested patch
> applied...
Ok cool.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
