Hm, seems I missed this before:
> --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
> +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ enum station_parameters_apply_mask {
> * @plink_action: plink action to take
> * @plink_state: set the peer link state for a station
> * @ht_capa: HT capabilities of station
> + * @vht_capa: VHT capabilities of station
> * @uapsd_queues: bitmap of queues configured for uapsd. same format
> * as the AC bitmap in the QoS info field
> * @max_sp: max Service Period. same format as the MAX_SP in the
> @@ -517,6 +518,7 @@ struct station_parameters {
> u8 plink_action;
> u8 plink_state;
> struct ieee80211_ht_cap *ht_capa;
> + struct ieee80211_vht_cap *vht_capa;
I don't think this should be part of this particular patch? Shouldn't
there be a cfg80211/nl80211 patch to allow hostapd to set this
information when adding a station, like for HT, and then that patch
introduces this struct member?
> + * @vht_cap: VHT capabilities of this STA; Not restricting any capabilities
> + * of remote STA. Taking as is.
Thanks :)
> - 2 + sizeof(struct ieee80211_vht_capabilities) + /* VHT */
> + 2 + sizeof(struct ieee80211_vht_cap) + /* VHT */
Maybe all this renaming (and the ieee80211.h change) could be a separate
patch? Then this would be easier to read overall I think.
> +#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
export.h isn't needed here (yet)
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
