On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:59 +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > Interesting, I guess this makes sense. Never seemed to come up, maybe it > > doesn't matter all that much since we sync once we receive some other > > beacon, so worst case we just transmit a few spuriously? > > Yes, that was the reported problem: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg96846.html That looks a bit different from what I thought though? Not really sure I understand that though :-) What I'm thinking is that if you always just start beaconing, wouldn't you just reset the beacon whenever you notice a higher TSF show up in the network? Actually I think we call reset_tsf() or something like that? But all of that has always seemed very quirky to me. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
