From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> When call_crda() is called we kick off a witch hunt search for the same regulatory domain on our internal regulatory database and that work gets kicked off on a workqueue, this is done while the cfg80211_mutex is held. If that workqueue kicks off it will first lock reg_regdb_search_mutex and later cfg80211_mutex but to ensure two CPUs will not contend against cfg80211_mutex the right thing to do is to have the reg_regdb_search() wait until the cfg80211_mutex is let go. The lockdep report is pasted below. cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.3.8 #3 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/0:1/235 is trying to acquire lock: (cfg80211_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<816468a4>] set_regdom+0x78c/0x808 [cfg80211] but task is already holding lock: (reg_regdb_search_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<81646828>] set_regdom+0x710/0x808 [cfg80211] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (reg_regdb_search_mutex){+.+...}: [<800a8384>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x88 [<802950a8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x31c [<81645778>] is_world_regdom+0x9f8/0xc74 [cfg80211] -> #1 (reg_mutex#2){+.+...}: [<800a8384>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x88 [<802950a8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x31c [<8164539c>] is_world_regdom+0x61c/0xc74 [cfg80211] -> #0 (cfg80211_mutex){+.+...}: [<800a77b8>] __lock_acquire+0x10d4/0x17bc [<800a8384>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x88 [<802950a8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x31c [<816468a4>] set_regdom+0x78c/0x808 [cfg80211] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cfg80211_mutex --> reg_mutex#2 --> reg_regdb_search_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(reg_regdb_search_mutex); lock(reg_mutex#2); lock(reg_regdb_search_mutex); lock(cfg80211_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/235: #0: (events){.+.+..}, at: [<80089a00>] process_one_work+0x230/0x460 #1: (reg_regdb_work){+.+...}, at: [<80089a00>] process_one_work+0x230/0x460 #2: (reg_regdb_search_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<81646828>] set_regdom+0x710/0x808 [cfg80211] stack backtrace: Call Trace: [<80290fd4>] dump_stack+0x8/0x34 [<80291bc4>] print_circular_bug+0x2ac/0x2d8 [<800a77b8>] __lock_acquire+0x10d4/0x17bc [<800a8384>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x88 [<802950a8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x31c [<816468a4>] set_regdom+0x78c/0x808 [cfg80211] Reported-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This v2 remoes the search lock from the context of calling set_regdom(). net/wireless/reg.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index 1ad04e5..4de18ae 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ static void reg_regdb_search(struct work_struct *work) struct reg_regdb_search_request *request; const struct ieee80211_regdomain *curdom, *regdom; int i, r; + bool set_reg = false; + + mutex_lock(&cfg80211_mutex); mutex_lock(®_regdb_search_mutex); while (!list_empty(®_regdb_search_list)) { @@ -365,9 +368,7 @@ static void reg_regdb_search(struct work_struct *work) r = reg_copy_regd(®dom, curdom); if (r) break; - mutex_lock(&cfg80211_mutex); - set_regdom(regdom); - mutex_unlock(&cfg80211_mutex); + set_reg = true; break; } } @@ -375,6 +376,11 @@ static void reg_regdb_search(struct work_struct *work) kfree(request); } mutex_unlock(®_regdb_search_mutex); + + if (set_reg) + set_regdom(regdom); + + mutex_unlock(&cfg80211_mutex); } static DECLARE_WORK(reg_regdb_work, reg_regdb_search); -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html