On 09/10/2012 08:33 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:22:30PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/05/2012 11:49 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Two fixes intended for the wireless tree. The issue with the .flush() has
been giving me a lot of email from RedHat's bugzilla server. Hope this
patch will silence that ;-)
Hi John,
I should remove that smile above, but are you planning to take these
for v3.6. At least the first patch is a clear bug fix that I would
like
to have applied.
Gr. AvS
Arend,
I held-off on these because of the continuing discussion...
Understood.
I definitely 'feel your pain' re: Red Hat bugzilla and the second
patch. But I'm not sure it meets either the 'small' or 'obvious'
tests, so I would prefer to leave it out for now. I'll take the
first one now.
Thanks. I wanted to make sure the first patch got in. While the second
improves the runtime behavior, it does not address the root cause
(whatever that is) so I agree to keep it out until I hammer it down.
Thanks,
John
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
