On 09/03/2012 09:15 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2012/8/31 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> +u32 bcma_gpio_in(struct bcma_bus *bus, u32 mask)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 res = 0;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->gpio_lock, flags);
>> + res = bcma_chipco_gpio_in(&bus->drv_cc, mask);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->gpio_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bcma_gpio_in);
>
>
> Could we put here direct ops on ChipCommon regs and drop GPIO
> functions from driver_chipcommon.c?
So you mean that all accesses to the gpio registers are locked, also
when b43 or bcma accesses them? If so, I will change my patch and test
it on my devices. I am currently not at my development machine and do
not have the test devices here, but I will see if I find some time on
Tuesday when I am home again.
So bcma_chipco_gpio_XXX() should not be exported in the way it is done
now any more and all accesses to the gpio registers should be locked.
Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
