On 09/07/2012 10:34 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
On 09/08/2012 10:03 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/07/2012 08:53 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The dereference should be moved below the NULL test.
spatch with a semantic match is used to found this.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
As long as you are reworking this section, doesn't BUG_ON seem a little harsh? I do not think the kernel should ever be crashed because a non-essential driver is messed up. As the patch would be a totally different change, it should be a new submission, but I think each of these conditions should trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE, and return IRQ_NONE when they occur.
You means the should be like this?
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c b/drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c
index aa71807..e42b100 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c
@@ -341,13 +341,16 @@ flush:
static irqreturn_t pn544_hci_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct pn544_hci_info *info = dev_id;
- struct i2c_client *client = info->i2c_dev;
+ struct i2c_client *client;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
int r;
- BUG_ON(!info);
- BUG_ON(irq != info->i2c_dev->irq);
+ if (!info || irq != info->i2c_dev->irq) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+ client = info->i2c_dev;
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "IRQ\n");
if (info->hard_fault != 0)
Yes, that looks better to me.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
