On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 11:18 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > + * @NL80211_ATTR_MAC_ACL_MAX: u16 attribute to advertise the maximum > + * number of mac addresses that a device can support for MAC > + * access control. Why not use u32? I know we won't use more than u16 most likely, but u32 takes just as much space in netlink messages ... > Drivers > + * which advertise the support for mac address based access control have to > + * implement this callback. You might consider checking this in register_wiphy? So about the race condition ... shouldn't the initial MAC list be given in the start_ap() call, so that the AP can start up with a proper ACL already in place, rather than starting up & then modifying later? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
