Hi Jonathan, On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: > >> I guess it could be split up, but I don't see the point. Technically >> this patch is not needed in stable, but the next patch in the series >> depends on this one and that one is targeted at stable, so therefore >> this one is targeted at stable as well. > > If I were to reroll the series without unnecessary changes, would that > be useful to you? Nevermind, I'll refactor the series myself to reduce the number of patches and to better separate the fixes from the clean-ups. I can probably do that much faster (within an hour) than you can. > > The whole point of point releases is to fix bugs while avoiding > pointless changes, providing a stable codebase that is easy to build > on and keeping the volume of new changes to sift through when > regressions are introduced low. > I agree. However, in this case I tried to balance new development with bug fixing to prevent a lot of double work (and failed to do so). --- Gertjan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
