Hi Mohammed, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:45:36 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > > Your patch is ok. But, at this point, should patch 2/6 and 3/6 be merged > > together? > > an order of interface combinations advertisement(2/6), followed by > removing specific > checks should be fine right ? In my opinion this is correct. But maybe Johannes has some arguments against this order? > > > > > Other than that, patch 2/6 should be modified to take into account IBSS mode. > > yeah saw your patch, that in ath9k_htc IBSS interface can coexist with > one more interface. > The standalone limitation exists in ath9k too, not sure this is a > limitation to beacon config > for ath9k & ath9k_htc, I will just confirm. If its fine i will resend > the v2 version signing off both > of our names accounting IBSS mode too. fine with me :) Thank you! -- Antonio Quartulli ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
