Hi Antonio, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Antonio Quartulli <ordex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:41:09 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi Johannes, >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Johannes Berg >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:48 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: >> >> Antonio, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Antonio Quartulli <ordex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > This driver now advertises its allowed VIFs combinations to the mac80211 >> >> > sublayer. >> >> > >> >> > Other than that, practical tests shown that ath9k_htc devices allow an IBSS VIF >> >> > to coexist with VIF set up on other modes. This patch removes the check which >> >> > block the creation of any other VIF whenever an IBSS one is already present. >> >> >> >> These two patches should really be applied in the opposite order: >> >> >> >> You should add the interface combination data (this patch) then remove >> >> the old checking code. >> >> >> >> This way there's not a window (admittedly only one patch) where the >> >> interface combinations aren't enforced. >> > >> > FWIW, it's the other way around, in that window no combinations would be >> > permitted at all... >> >> It's still a problem for bisection then =) > > Shall I merge the two patches and do both the changes in one shot? You might as well, however you should address Mohammed's comment first. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
