What are the prerequisite patches for this one? It seems to be based
on something other than wireless-next.
John
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:12:35AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Jack <x6719620@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bcma/host_pci.c | 1 +
> drivers/bcma/sprom.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> index f7b0af7..b6b4b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(bcma_pci_bridge_tbl) = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4331) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4353) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4357) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4358) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4359) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4727) },
> { 0, },
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> index 9ea4627..0d546b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/sprom.c
> @@ -507,7 +507,9 @@ static bool bcma_sprom_onchip_available(struct bcma_bus *bus)
> /* for these chips OTP is always available */
> present = true;
> break;
> + case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43227:
> case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43228:
> + case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM43428:
> present = chip_status & BCMA_CC_CHIPST_43228_OTP_PRESENT;
> break;
> default:
> --
> 1.7.7
>
>
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
