On 08/16/2012 07:39 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2012/8/16 Florian Fainelli<florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>+void __init bcm47xx_gpio_init(void)
>>+{
>>+ int err;
>>+
>>+ switch (bcm47xx_bus_type) {
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_BCM47XX_SSB
>>+ case BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_SSB:
>>+ bcm47xx_gpio_count = ssb_gpio_count(&bcm47xx_bus.ssb);
>>+#endif
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_BCM47XX_BCMA
>>+ case BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_BCMA:
>>+ bcm47xx_gpio_count = bcma_gpio_count(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma.bus);
>>+#endif
>>+ }
>
>Is this exclusive? Cannot we have both SSB and BCMA on the same device?
This applies to SoC only, so I believe it's fine. We don't have SoCs
based on BCMA and SSB at the same time.
It is indeed more than unlikely for a chip to have two silicon
interconnects, which is what SSB and BCMA are. However, it does look
suspicious from a code reading perspective. So I general I stick to the
rule that each case must have a break and fall-thru are clearly commented.
You can find devices with multiple buses, but additional ones are
connected via PCIE or USB interface (or some other I don't know
about).
-- Rafał
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
