Search Linux Wireless

Re: WDS vs. multi-channel operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-08-05 7:22 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 19:21 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 19:12 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> > On 2012-07-30 3:36 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > > Ok so I'm chipping away at multi-channel operation, but WDS is
>> > > troubling. Which channel should it use? It doesn't even have channel
>> > > configuration today, but relies on having a channel already, but that
>> > > breaks when you have multi-channel since then it either has to have its
>> > > own channel or be slaved to another channel...
>> > > 
>> > > Anyone have any ideas?
>> > Let's bind WDS interfaces to AP VIFs, then they can be slave to the AP's
>> > channel context. This is necessary for my yet-to-be-resubmitted WDS
>> > fixes anyway.
>> 
>> For now I decided that drivers supporting the channel context APIs will
>> not be allowed to support WDS interfaces :-P
>> (and the code in WDS TX will simply take the global channel as before)
>> 
>> So ... yes, I think this makes sense, but I'm not sure I care enough to
>> implement it right now, I have enough other things with multi-channel
>> still to do ... Though the question remains *how* we bind them. We could
>> try to match them by MAC address when they're brought up (and require
>> the same MAC address?), or do explicit binding, or something else
>> entirely ...
>> 
>> If you're going to require them to be bound to an AP though, where's the
>> difference to the current 4-addr AP_VLAN behaviour? It seems with that
>> you could actually implement a bound-to-AP-WDS entirely in userspace
>> since there's no requirement to actually go through the auth/assoc
>> sequence for hostapd to add the station entry?
> 
> Oh and if you actually do need WDS-type interfaces, maybe their role
> should change to be virtual like AP_VLAN-type interfaces?
The difference between WDS and 4-addr AP_VLAN is that WDS is AP<->AP,
not AP<->STA. I guess it would be possible to write some code to create
AP VLANs + station entries for remote APs based on cooked monitor mode
based discovery or some form of mgmt frame exchange.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux