On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 12:33 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > Currently, ps mode is indicated per device (rather than > per interface), which doesn't make a lot of sense. > > Moreover, there are subtle bugs caused by the inability > to indicate ps change along with other changes > (e.g. when the AP deauth us, we'd like to indicate > CHANGED_PS | CHANGED_ASSOC, as changing PS before > notifying about disassociation will result in null-packets > being sent (if IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS) while > the sta is already disconnected.) > > Keep the current per-device notifications, and add > parallel per-vif notifications. > > In order to keep it simple, the per-device ps and > the per-vif ps are orthogonal - the per-vif ps > configuration is determined only by the user > configuration (enable/disable) and the connection > state, and is not affected by other vifs state and > (temporary) dynamic_ps/offchannel operations > (unlike per-device ps). Applied, thanks. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
