Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: 80MHz (11ac) regulatory change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/24/2012 02:26 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
It would be really good if you could convince your email client to put >
in front of each quoted line ... this is really confusing as is.


Sorry. Switched to thunderbird now.

Also, I believe there are many more possibilities, since we count from
the control channel -- ie. for HT HT40+ means secondary channel is above
the control channel. For VHT 80, you're going to have 4 possibilities:

|-1-|-2-|-3-|-4-|

the control channel can be any one of these four I believe? So you'd
have configurations like

VHT_CHAN_LAYOUT_0_3
VHT_CHAN_LAYOUT_1_2
VHT_CHAN_LAYOUT_2_1
VHT_CHAN_LAYOUT_3_0

indicating the number of channels below/above control (for control
channel 1,2,3,4 respectively). Similarly, for VHT160 you'd have 8
possibilities:

|-1-|-2-|-3-|-4-|-5-|-6-|-7-|-8-|

(which one could again capture as VHT_CHAN_LAYOUT_0_7 etc.)

[MP] I see your point. But according to 11ac spec, AP will use primary
chan as specified in HT operation IE chan num. Secondary channel is
center freq specified in VHT Operation IE. So I am thinking secondary
channel is not relative offset to primary channel. Hope I am not
mistaken here.

Ok so HT has primary channel and secondary, and VHT has secondary VHT
which can again be above/below? That would make sense, but you wouldn't
be covering it.


I am thinking no need of above/below convention as the center frequency value itself we know.

+     /* This would happen when regulatory rules disallow VHT80 completely */
+     if (IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_VHT80 == (chan->flags & (IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_VHT80)))
+             return true;

Is that really right? Need to document what the return value of this
function should be, I guess?

[MP] I guess, it's possible for a channel not allowed for 80Mhz operation.

Yeah but should it really check *all* the bits rather than any one of
them?


You mean to say other bits like HT40MINUS, HT40PLUS or even DFS?

+     /*
+      * Please note that this assumes target bandwidth is 40 MHz,
+      * if that ever changes we also need to change the below logic
+      * to include that as well.
+      */

???

[MP] Can you explain? This function doesn't make any sense?

The comment about 40 MHz doesn't make any sense.


Agree. I will change this.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux