On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Andrew Chant <andrew.chant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any QCA people get a chance to take a look? This is completely > reproducible for me on 3.4.4, sometimes within a few minutes but > occasionally requires up to an hour. Do you qca folks have any tests > where you continuously transmit as many UDP packets as you possibly > can to another host? please check whether the following patch helps. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/93723 Could please help whether it happens with wireless-testing tree ? http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/git-guide#Cloning_latest_wireless-testing > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Andrew Chant <andrew.chant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I was able to reproduce this on a boot shortly afterwards without >> changing the frequencies. >> Exact same stack trace w/ exception of slightly different values for >> RBX & R15, and R10 had 0x7f instead of 0x80. I have not been able to >> reproduce since despite trying quite hard :) I have a picture of the >> second oops if that helps. >> PCI ID is 168c:0030 (AR9300 Wireless LAN adaptor (rev 01)) >> -Andrew >> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Johannes Berg >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> -John >>> +QCA folks >>> >>> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 21:36 -0700, Andrew Chant wrote: >>> >>>> while performance testing ath9k -> ath9k performance in 3.4.4, I got >>>> a nasty kernel panic. My performance testing involved filling the air >>>> with 1410-byte UDP packets between the machines, and switching the >>>> frequencies of the two cards to see how frequency affected >>>> performance. I had switched between channels 36, 40, 44, and 48. >>>> Oops was on the transmitting machine, which was acting as the AP. >>>> >>>> Very clear screen image of the oops is at >>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/CjBdHLZH0up5PrnmCySJidMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink >>> >>> I briefly looked at this, but I don't see a bug in mac80211. It seems >>> likely that ath9k hands back a corrupted SKB, or frees one it no longer >>> owns, or such. The skb->next/prev pointers seem corrupted (rcx is NULL) >>> in one of the SKBs on the list, but mac80211 can't do that afaict. >>> >>> johannes >>> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- thanks, shafi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html