Hi Johannes,
thanks for getting back to this :)
On Thursday 12 July 2012 07:54 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:03 +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
I don't know if there's any advantage. It could be useful for example to
get a connection up quicker after resume. I just didn't want to preclude
that use case.
sorry i just missed this thing. rdev->wowlan is made 'false' for empty
I think you mean "NULL"?
oh yes.
Maybe something like this would make sense then?
http://p.sipsolutions.net/2aac79bcfe3a9b8b.txt
yeah this was the thing i am proposing
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg94023.html
your patch is better optimized as it avoids a bool variable to check for
wow disable command, so this should be fine with the other iw
patch to check for empty triggers ?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg94022.html
thank you!
johannes
--
thanks,
shafi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
