On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 09:26 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > I've skipped the other comments as I can address those in a new series. > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So I'm not really convinced about this. It seems this Kconfig should > > better be a Kconfig that enables other Kconfig only, not enabling other > > features. How else would anyone be able to do due diligence and check > > what exactly this enables that they need to test? > > Makes sense, so would we then have CONFIG_REG_HINT_CELL_BASE_STATION ? I don't know how fine-grained it should be? Maybe it should be more generic and be a config for all (future) kinds of user hints? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
